|
Post by Brewers GM(Mike) on Mar 11, 2023 12:52:20 GMT -6
Has been removed.
If anyone would like to join him I can accommodate that.
|
|
|
Cubs owner
Mar 14, 2023 13:44:35 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Baltimore Orioles (Sidney) on Mar 14, 2023 13:44:35 GMT -6
I was hoping for some kind of explanation as to why this decision was made. Since no one has asked I'm asking.
Why has Cubs owner been removed?
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals GM(Jared) on Mar 14, 2023 13:59:05 GMT -6
No one needs to ask Bc we all know why.
Very simply stated he broke the code of conduct when he said he would abide.
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals GM(Jared) on Mar 14, 2023 13:59:59 GMT -6
|
|
|
Cubs owner
Mar 14, 2023 16:34:00 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Baltimore Orioles (Sidney) on Mar 14, 2023 16:34:00 GMT -6
Which part though? I'm trying to understand. What's trash talk and what's offending someone so to say?
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals GM(Jared) on Mar 14, 2023 19:10:42 GMT -6
I understand you are friends with him. You’ve never once spoken to me in the way he would regularly.
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM(Mike) on Mar 15, 2023 5:47:02 GMT -6
Respectfully O's I'm not going to get into it. But there is a history there that you were not around for. When I choose to let him back into the league it was made very clear to him under what conditions that would be allowed and what my tolerance of certain things would be.
|
|
|
Post by Baltimore Orioles (Sidney) on Mar 16, 2023 10:06:35 GMT -6
Noted. The fact that there is history can be seen from the different instances of group posts, where some messages are clearly directed at certain persons.
I also brought up the fact and suggested it was perhaps a good idea to discuss things, instead of sending puns to one another.
This latest episode had exchanges between commish and Cubs Owner. After which a post came informing that Cubs owner has been removed.
From the post it wasn't clear to me that a line was crossed on the side of the one being removed. That's why I asked for a clarification. And so far this question has been answered with something in the line of 1. We all know why so we aren't getting into it 2. A rule was broken that was previously broken.
Personally I don't understand the need for the vagueness... But consider my question answered.
|
|