|
Post by Cardinals GM(Jared) on Jul 10, 2012 14:22:07 GMT -6
Cardinals Send:
Nick Castellanos Brandon league 2012 3.75 6th round pick (ATL)
Indians Send: Adam Wainright 2012* 18.75 Kyle Lohse 2012 2.2 Ronald Bellisario 2012 1.0
Cardinals Release Brennan Boesch 2014 8.0 (what a disappointment) Raul Ibanez 2012 1.0
And for anyone who would like to complain or another verb that rhymes with snitch -
Reference this deal:
http://kirbypuckettmemorial.proboards.co....lay&thread=1932
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM(Mike) on Jul 10, 2012 14:57:05 GMT -6
Accept
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM(Mike) on Jul 10, 2012 16:43:59 GMT -6
I will be making a corresponding move to get under the prospect cap here shortly. If anyone is interested in trading me some better picks then what i have for a prospect send me an offer tonight.
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals GM(Jared) on Jul 11, 2012 16:19:10 GMT -6
Who are you dropping to make this legit? You can flip him until this is official and isnt official until you cut.
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Braves GM(T.J.) on Jul 11, 2012 16:31:42 GMT -6
We have always allowed an owner that 24 hour block of time to make a corresponding deal. You should remember as you have used the fluff time more than once over the years.
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals GM(Jared) on Jul 11, 2012 16:59:00 GMT -6
Yea but to acquire Castellanos he has to get rid of something. You can't trade some thing not on your roster.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2012 17:03:26 GMT -6
That be true, haven't thought of that before,,,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2012 17:11:05 GMT -6
[quote author=mgweiss board=tradesubmission thread=2089 post=9727 time=1341960239]I will be making a corresponding move to get under the prospect cap here shortly. If anyone is interested in trading me some better picks then what i have for a prospect send me an offer tonight.[/quote]
U really didn't do it if U really think about it hate this but gotha Agree with Cards here! He is Spot On! You have to Drop someone to Acquire Nick and THEN U can make another move U CAN'T just KEEP 20 Prospect and Flip Nick Over because then U be having ILLEGALLY 21 Prospect DURING the Trade,,, maybe it's been Done before we don't know or can't remember but Guess we have to keep an Open eye again!!
|
|
|
Post by Red Sox GM(Landon) on Jul 11, 2012 18:13:44 GMT -6
I think this has to be vetoed unless Indians drops someone. I knew we were given 24 hours to drop someone but the trade doesn't go through until someone is dropped which would make the other deal with Braves illegal as well.
Once Indians drops someone this deal can go through and I see no problem with it but this trade puts Indians over the 20 prospect limit and then he technically trades someone he doesn't have to Braves cause this trade has to go through before he has Castellanos
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals GM(Jared) on Jul 11, 2012 18:25:15 GMT -6
THere is one veto! I would have done it but i can't vote on my own deal!
|
|
|
Post by New York Yankees GM(Tommy) on Jul 11, 2012 18:31:14 GMT -6
yeah gotta veto here as well based on the rule structure brought forward
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM(Mike) on Jul 11, 2012 18:42:45 GMT -6
I still don't see how this trade is being vetoed, if anything my trade with Braves should be the one being vetoed. See the Indians-Rockes Jay Bruce deal.
I am allowed to go over the cap, I just have to make another move that doesn't involve Castellanos to make room for him.
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM(Mike) on Jul 11, 2012 18:44:35 GMT -6
So correct me if I'm wrong but I can trade a different prospect to make room for Castellanos?
|
|
|
Post by New York Yankees GM(Tommy) on Jul 11, 2012 18:48:31 GMT -6
Yeah I probably put this in the wrong list. The fact is to me this isn't even a veto deal. The Castellanos deal is simply dis-allowed because of rule breaking. I just veto'd quick, sorry been away a few days and catching up now, should have been a veto for the Castellanos to Braves when he didn't officially own him
|
|
|
Post by Red Sox GM(Landon) on Jul 11, 2012 18:50:52 GMT -6
Maybe vetoed was the wrong way to word it. Disallowed sounds right. A prospect not named Castellanos needs to be dropped or traded then there is no problem here
|
|